نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی
2 دانشیار دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The authorship of obligation of “Must” is one of the cases of the functional Establishments propounded in Allamah Tabataba’ee’s theory of Establishments. He believes that no action can be done by man without authorship of a public must. On the contrary, some scholars hold that considering this must as an established concept leads to generalization of relativity to the scopes of jurisprudence and ethics and therefore, they denied such a must or by referring it to the secondary contemplatives have solved the problem of Must in the jurisprudential and ethical issues. But what is the meaning of Public Must and does it lead to relativity? The present research has proved by an analytic and critical method that the meaning of the Public Must in Allamah Tabataba’iee’s viewpoint is different from what his critiques have understood. The nature and function of the “Established Must” are different from the jurisprudential and ethical Musts and the doubts propounded stem from confusion between these two concepts. Establishment of the Public Must never leads to relativity and in fact the origin and position of this Must are such that it is neutral as to being value or non-value of the acts.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)