نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری جامعه المصطفی العالمیه، مشهد، ایران
2 استادیار گروه علوم قرآن و حدیث جامعه المصطفی العالمیه، مشهد، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Some Muslim scholars, citing the appearance of verse 24 of Surah Yusuf and a number of weak hadiths, have attributed the intention of sin to Prophet Yusuf. Another group has also provided illogical interpretations for the verse. This situation has made it difficult to understand the meaning of the verse. The present research has analyzed and criticized the most important ideas and interpretations about the verse in a descriptive and analytical way. The achievement of this research is to explain and establish the theory of the difference between "Hammat" and "Hamma" in the two sentences "Hammat Behe Wa Hamma Beha" (She certainly made for him; and he would have made for her). By the evidence of the sentences "wa rawdatha allati huwa fi baytiha", "haita laka", "ma'aaza Allah" and "Innaho min Ibadina al mukhlasin", Zulaikha’s “Hamma” belongs to committing a sin, but Yusuf’s “Hamma” belongs to an act that prevents from sin, not the intention of sin. For this reason, the word "Hamma" is repeated twice to indicate this fundamental difference. Therefore, the meaning of the verse is as follows: "Zulaikha intended to commit a sin with Yusuf, and Yusuf intended to prevent Zulaikha from committing a sin by doing a deterrent act." At this moment, if God's proof had not come, that is, if Yusuf had not been aware by God of the consequences of any reaction in front of Zulaikha, he would have carried out that preventive action and in that case he would have been accused of treason, but when Yusuf got this knowledge, he did not make a move and left the scene. In this way, God removed evil (accusatory act) and Fahsha (adultery) away from Yusuf. This is the meaning of absolute infallibility that all divine prophets, including Yusuf, were ascribed to it.
کلیدواژهها [English]
قرآن کریم
)