نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری رشته الهیات ، گروه فلسفه و کلام اسلامی ،دانشکده علوم انسانی و حقوق ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی اصفهان(خوراسگان)، اصفهان، ایران
2 عضو هیئت علمی( استاد ) دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان). اصفهان، ایران
3 گروه فلسفه و کلام اسلامی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه اصفهان
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Many reasons have been used to prove the Necessary Existent in the history of religion, philosophy, and theology. Reasons that have been able to change people’s minds making them believe in the existence of the Almighty despite of them being justifiable or not. Ibn Sina is among philosophers who has mentioned various ways to prove the existence of the Necessary Existent. According to him the “application of existence and application of being”, “application of possible being”, “concept of existence”, and “concept of Necessary Existent” are the four paths that will lead to prove of His existence. This research elucidates the four reasons comprehensively and identifies their points of differences. It indicates that only two reasons of “application of existence and being”, and “concept of existence” can be submitted to by overlooking some of the qualities of an infinite series. However, the reasons that have been mentioned according to the “application of possible being”, and “concept of Necessary Existent” are incapable of proving the Necessary Existent.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)