نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 گروه معارف، دانشکده الهیات و معارف اسلامی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، خراسان رضوی
2 مدیر گروه معارف، دانشکده الهیات و معارف اسلامی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، خراسان رضوی
3 معارف اسلامی، دانشکده الهیات و معارف اسلامی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد
4 دانشیار گروه معارف اسلامی دانشکده الهیات و معارف اسلامی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The theological role of the miracle in proving prophethood has made it becoming the center of discussion in interfaith dialogues of Islam and Christianity. Norman L Geisler, philosopher and defender of systematic theology of Christianity, is among those who has reviewed the miracles of the Prophet in three stages of possibility, actuality, and refusal. He considers verses that imply the possibility and actuality of miracles with scientific, rational, literal, interpretive, narrative, and historical criticism. His statements have been reviewed in this article with emphasis on ʿAllāma Ṭabāṭabāī’s view. Accordingly the most important methodological problems of Norman Geisler includes lack of consideration for the achievements of ḥadith-criticism science, and understanding the Qur’an using the commentary method of interpreting the Qur’an with the Qur’an, and consideration of context and logical implications of the verses. Among the benefits of using ʿAllāma Ṭabāṭabāī’s view in critical analysis of Norman Geisler’s view includes the consideration of miracles’ voluntarily guidance aspect, material and spiritual aspects of miracles such as the Me’raj (Muhammad’s ascend to heaven) and having the capability of being measured, imaginal aspect of Shaq al-Sadr (opening of the chest), criteria of assessing Shaq al-Qamar (splitting of the moon) miracle, and justification of refusing requested miracles (Iqtirahi).
کلیدواژهها [English]