نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار و عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد
2 دانشجوی دکترای دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
In analysis of the Salafi School of thought which is one of kind, in interpretation of the assimilated attributes three categories could be discussed which are: 1. Analysis of general foundation and methodology of Salafi school of thought and how it has impacted the proving of the attributes. 2. Elucidation of principles and edited rules of Salafi School used as proofs. And 3. Pathology of example cases where such principles were applied. Along the same line it could be said that most of the criticism against Salafi School of thought in area of interpretation of the attributes will revolve around two categories which are analysis of general foundation and pathology of its examples (first and third category). Hence the current research has emphasized its efforts on expurgation, inquisition and criticism of principles and foundation of the School of proving attributes (expurgation of specific foundations) as primary source which has been forgotten in criticism of such School. In addition the Salafi School will be criticized on some false requisites of it on proving attributes such as Simile and Visualization alongside of the same category. After a comprehensive and through review it could be said that matters such as fallacious arguments without logical foundation, extreme formalism in attributes and propagandist and dogmatic interaction in elucidation of principles of the School of proving attributes are the most important shortcomings of the Salafi researchers in proving their School of thought.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)