نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانش پژوه سطح چهار رشته کلام مقارن حوزه علمیه خراسان، مشهد، ایران.
2 استادیار گروه علوم قرآن و حدیث،دانشگاه جامعه المصطفی العالمیه،قم،ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The Wahhabi movement, with its superficial and takfiri interpretations, has always caused doubts and ideological differences in the Islamic world. This research examines the theological foundations of Mohammad Omar Sarbazi, one of the prominent Deobandi scholars in Iran, as a representative of the mainstream Sunni movement, in response to these doubts. This study was conducted using an analytical-descriptive method and citing Sarbazi's written works and other main Deobandi and Wahhabi texts. The findings show that Sarbazi, relying on the foundations of the Matridi school, Hanafi jurisprudence, and Naqshbandi Sufism, has criticized Wahhabiism in eight main areas:
1. Takfir: Citing the rule of "not takfirizing the people of the Qiblah", he strongly opposes the takfiri approach of Wahhabiism.
2. News attributes: He considers the interpretation of these attributes necessary to avoid similes and personification, contrary to the "lack of quality" approach of Wahhabiism.
3. Intermission: By proving the life of the prophets and saints in their graves and hearing the dead, it strengthens the ideological foundations of tawasul, ziyarat, and istigatha.
4. Tawasul and istigatha: It considers tawasul to the essence of the Prophet (PBUH) and saints - whether in life or after death - permissible, provided that there is no belief in their independence.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)