Al-Mustafa International University Theology Journal 2476-5325 2 3 2016 01 21 Required Gnosis in Principles of Religion Required Gnosis in Principles of Religion 5 26 1695 FA Rahmatollah Karimzadeh Assistant Professor, Razavi Islamic University Mohammad Ishagh Aarefee Assistant Professor, Al-Mustafa International University Journal Article 2015 04 27 In what manner of gnosis within principles of religion is among the important topics of religious knowledge. The main issue is that what kind of gnosis is required in religious principles or beliefs. Does it have to be a certain knowledge or suspicion will be enough as well? Various viewpoints and words yet contradictory have been said in this matter. In this paper after describing viewpoints of such topic we will review the required matters of religious principles and the content of arguments. It is concluded that at beginning the logical certainty in regards to religious principles is needed and if such knowledge is impossible for some, determinant beliefs is required and even if that is impossible then a belief on what is in reality is necessary. In what manner of gnosis within principles of religion is among the important topics of religious knowledge. The main issue is that what kind of gnosis is required in religious principles or beliefs. Does it have to be a certain knowledge or suspicion will be enough as well? Various viewpoints and words yet contradictory have been said in this matter. In this paper after describing viewpoints of such topic we will review the required matters of religious principles and the content of arguments. It is concluded that at beginning the logical certainty in regards to religious principles is needed and if such knowledge is impossible for some, determinant beliefs is required and even if that is impossible then a belief on what is in reality is necessary.

http://pke.journals.miu.ac.ir/article_1695_84e5c34795cd71075f7e567115cfa331.pdf

Al-Mustafa International University Theology Journal 2476-5325 2 3 2016 01 21 Sovereignty of “Corresponding Realms” Principle in Elucidating “Visualization of Actions” in Transcendent Wisdom Sovereignty of “Corresponding Realms” Principle in Elucidating “Visualization of Actions” in Transcendent Wisdom 27 46 1696 FA Narjes Roodgar teacher assistant of Islamic philosophy and mysticism,bentolhoda,jamee almostafa,qom,iran. Journal Article 2015 05 26 The theory of “Visualization of Actions” meaning visualization of intentions, thoughts and actions in the next realm is one of the teachings within Islamic Eschatology which has defenders and critics. Mulla Sadra has provided some arguments for logical proof of the subject using the indicator principles of Transcendent Wisdom. The sovereignty principle of those arguments is “Corresponding Realms”. Corresponding Realms, meaning the superior and completed existence of the lower realms within the higher realms will get proved based on the principles of absoluteness, simplicity, graduation of existence, the existence of a dependent intermediator. Mulla Sadra proves the Visualization of Actions using the principle of Corresponding Realms. Prove of visualizing actions based on the corresponding realms principle will have the proof of the Bodily Resurrection as well. In addition, another argument of Mulla Sadra for Bodily Resurrection is based on the combination of intelligence and intelligible and it will be referable to reasoning based on corresponding realms. The theory of “Visualization of Actions” meaning visualization of intentions, thoughts and actions in the next realm is one of the teachings within Islamic Eschatology which has defenders and critics. Mulla Sadra has provided some arguments for logical proof of the subject using the indicator principles of Transcendent Wisdom. The sovereignty principle of those arguments is “Corresponding Realms”. Corresponding Realms, meaning the superior and completed existence of the lower realms within the higher realms will get proved based on the principles of absoluteness, simplicity, graduation of existence, the existence of a dependent intermediator. Mulla Sadra proves the Visualization of Actions using the principle of Corresponding Realms. Prove of visualizing actions based on the corresponding realms principle will have the proof of the Bodily Resurrection as well. In addition, another argument of Mulla Sadra for Bodily Resurrection is based on the combination of intelligence and intelligible and it will be referable to reasoning based on corresponding realms.

http://pke.journals.miu.ac.ir/article_1696_3621aa94aad9216e3c726b5a66f717c3.pdf

Al-Mustafa International University Theology Journal 2476-5325 2 3 2016 01 21 Analysis of Constructive Strategies of Salafi in Interpretation of Assimilated Attributes with a Focus of Theological View of Ibn Taymiyyah Analysis of Constructive Strategies of Salafi in Interpretation of Assimilated Attributes with a Focus of Theological View of Ibn Taymiyyah 47 66 1697 FA Mohammad Ali Rezai Kermani Associate Professor, Mashhad Ferdowsi University Abbas Ismailizadeh Associate Professor, Mashhad Ferdowsi University Hasan Naghizadeh Associate Professor, Mashhad Ferdowsi University Hamid Imandar PhD student of Mashhad Ferdowsi University Journal Article 2015 07 01 In analysis of the Salafi School of thought which is one of kind, in interpretation of the assimilated attributes three categories could be discussed which are: 1. Analysis of general foundation and methodology of Salafi school of thought and how it has impacted the proving of the attributes. 2. Elucidation of principles and edited rules of Salafi School used as proofs. And 3. Pathology of example cases where such principles were applied. Along the same line it could be said that most of the criticism against Salafi School of thought in area of interpretation of the attributes will revolve around two categories which are analysis of general foundation and pathology of its examples (first and third category). Hence the current research has emphasized its efforts on expurgation, inquisition and criticism of principles and foundation of the School of proving attributes (expurgation of specific foundations) as primary source which has been forgotten in criticism of such School. In addition the Salafi School will be criticized on some false requisites of it on proving attributes such as Simile and Visualization alongside of the same category. After a comprehensive and through review it could be said that matters such as fallacious arguments without logical foundation, extreme formalism in attributes and propagandist and dogmatic interaction in elucidation of principles of the School of proving attributes are the most important shortcomings of the Salafi researchers in proving their School of thought. In analysis of the Salafi School of thought which is one of kind, in interpretation of the assimilated attributes three categories could be discussed which are: 1. Analysis of general foundation and methodology of Salafi school of thought and how it has impacted the proving of the attributes. 2. Elucidation of principles and edited rules of Salafi School used as proofs. And 3. Pathology of example cases where such principles were applied. Along the same line it could be said that most of the criticism against Salafi School of thought in area of interpretation of the attributes will revolve around two categories which are analysis of general foundation and pathology of its examples (first and third category). Hence the current research has emphasized its efforts on expurgation, inquisition and criticism of principles and foundation of the School of proving attributes (expurgation of specific foundations) as primary source which has been forgotten in criticism of such School. In addition the Salafi School will be criticized on some false requisites of it on proving attributes such as Simile and Visualization alongside of the same category. After a comprehensive and through review it could be said that matters such as fallacious arguments without logical foundation, extreme formalism in attributes and propagandist and dogmatic interaction in elucidation of principles of the School of proving attributes are the most important shortcomings of the Salafi researchers in proving their School of thought.

http://pke.journals.miu.ac.ir/article_1697_409bf20119b4be3f87a2aeaa4b1d6835.pdf

Al-Mustafa International University Theology Journal 2476-5325 2 3 2016 01 21 The Role of Holy Prophet (s.a.w) and the Infallible Imams in Canonization of Jurisprudential Rules The Role of Holy Prophet (s.a.w) and the Infallible Imams in Canonization of Jurisprudential Rules 67 88 1698 FA Hasan Ali Akhlaghi Amiri Associate professor of Al Mustafa International University Hadi Hashemi Master Program of Theology, University of Semnan Journal Article 2015 05 22 The canonization and placement of jurisprudential rules is on the hand of the Almighty as the creator of the creation and the Lord of men based on religious foundations, however there has been always a discussion among the Islamic scholars since the beginning of Islam on whether the right of canonization and placement of jurisprudential rules is also in the hand of the Holy Prophet (s.a.w) and the Infallible Imams as well or they were only in charge of preaching the rules and elucidation and no more? Using various narrations and other arguments some have considered such right for the Infallibles as well – while some of them consider such right only for the Holy Prophet (s.a.w) where others extend it to the Imams as well – while others rejects such theory based on logical arguments. In this paper in addition to description of both arguments, their theories have been summoned and the possibility of a verbal dispute has been increased meaning each side has taken over an aspect of the word Tashri’ (canonization) which will have great impacts on resolving such argument. The canonization and placement of jurisprudential rules is on the hand of the Almighty as the creator of the creation and the Lord of men based on religious foundations, however there has been always a discussion among the Islamic scholars since the beginning of Islam on whether the right of canonization and placement of jurisprudential rules is also in the hand of the Holy Prophet (s.a.w) and the Infallible Imams as well or they were only in charge of preaching the rules and elucidation and no more? Using various narrations and other arguments some have considered such right for the Infallibles as well – while some of them consider such right only for the Holy Prophet (s.a.w) where others extend it to the Imams as well – while others rejects such theory based on logical arguments. In this paper in addition to description of both arguments, their theories have been summoned and the possibility of a verbal dispute has been increased meaning each side has taken over an aspect of the word Tashri’ (canonization) which will have great impacts on resolving such argument.

http://pke.journals.miu.ac.ir/article_1698_b0211093bcae430683945de48a9da3ef.pdf

Al-Mustafa International University Theology Journal 2476-5325 2 3 2016 01 21 Monotheism Theory in the words of Seyed Haydar Amoli and Imam Khomein Monotheism Theory in the words of Seyed Haydar Amoli and Imam Khomein 89 106 1699 FA Azim Hamzeian . Assistant Professor, Theology department of Semnan University Ali Sanaee Assistant Processor, Theology department of Semnan University Tooba Rashidinasab Master Program of Islamic Mysticism, University of Semnan Journal Article 2015 06 04 The topic of Monotheism (Towhid) is considered among the important subjects of Theology, Mysticism and Philosophy. In this article, the viewpoints of Seyed Haydar Amoli and Imam Khomeini has been compared and analyzed using theologian – mystical approach and especially theoretical Mysticism. Seyed Haydar Amoli, in his works, has described Monotheism, its placement along with its undefinable types and its degrees and has distinguished the Monotheism of those who go by the Sharia (Religious rules), Tariqah (Spiritual path) and the Haghighat (Truth). Imam Khomeini, however, has talked about simplicity and the Unity of God and its literal meaning. In regards to the importance of its placement within three areas of Ontology, Epistemology and Unitarian Anthropology, Seyed Haydar Amoli has emphasized a lot on the nature while Imam Khomeini has focused on Scientific and Practical Unity along with the Unity of Heart. There are also some similarities and differences in terms of divisions, degrees and pillars of Monotheism within their works. Imam Khomeini has emphasized on the knowledge of Monotheism being the barrier to the Path of Truth yet Seyed Haydar Amoli has emphasized on it being the base of all other sciences, while the similarities of the two in this subject is quite a lot. The topic of Monotheism (Towhid) is considered among the important subjects of Theology, Mysticism and Philosophy. In this article, the viewpoints of Seyed Haydar Amoli and Imam Khomeini has been compared and analyzed using theologian – mystical approach and especially theoretical Mysticism. Seyed Haydar Amoli, in his works, has described Monotheism, its placement along with its undefinable types and its degrees and has distinguished the Monotheism of those who go by the Sharia (Religious rules), Tariqah (Spiritual path) and the Haghighat (Truth). Imam Khomeini, however, has talked about simplicity and the Unity of God and its literal meaning. In regards to the importance of its placement within three areas of Ontology, Epistemology and Unitarian Anthropology, Seyed Haydar Amoli has emphasized a lot on the nature while Imam Khomeini has focused on Scientific and Practical Unity along with the Unity of Heart. There are also some similarities and differences in terms of divisions, degrees and pillars of Monotheism within their works. Imam Khomeini has emphasized on the knowledge of Monotheism being the barrier to the Path of Truth yet Seyed Haydar Amoli has emphasized on it being the base of all other sciences, while the similarities of the two in this subject is quite a lot.

http://pke.journals.miu.ac.ir/article_1699_73881890fe9887cdad9678bbe22bc31d.pdf

Al-Mustafa International University Theology Journal 2476-5325 2 3 2016 01 21 A Criticism of Madelung View in Regards to Caliphate of Imam Ali (Peace be upon him) in the book of “The Succession to Muhammad” A Criticism of Madelung View in Regards to Caliphate of Imam Ali (Peace be upon him) in the book of “The Succession to Muhammad” 107 128 1700 FA Hussein Abdulmuhammadi Associate Professor, Al-Mustafa International University Murteza Alavi Master Program of Maaref University Journal Article 2015 04 30 Wilferd Ferdinand Madelung, the author of “The Succession to Muhammad”, is a German orientalist whom has reviewed the topic of Prophet’s succession in a special approach. His view in comparison with other orientalists is more knowledgeable and fair but due to his cultural, political and social limitations he was not able to explain the problem completely. Madelung has referred to Quran’s view in regards to prophet’s successorship at the beginning of his book and believes that the Quran has no verse in regards to this matter, however it has many recommendations for looking after the family and relatives of the Prophet. Also he has mentioned the approach of previous prophets in choosing the successor which states that they usually tend to choose one among their relatives as their successor and had this idea that through those verses it could be concluded that the holy Prophet was concerned with the severity of this matter and had liked to choose a person among his family to be his successor, but before he was able to do so, his death arrived suddenly and he was not able to complete his task. In addition he tends to review the verses in which the virtues of Ahlul-Bayt has been mentioned and rejects their implications. This article will try to explain his view in regards to successorship of the Prophet and then it will criticize it through facts and logic. Wilferd Ferdinand Madelung, the author of “The Succession to Muhammad”, is a German orientalist whom has reviewed the topic of Prophet’s succession in a special approach. His view in comparison with other orientalists is more knowledgeable and fair but due to his cultural, political and social limitations he was not able to explain the problem completely. Madelung has referred to Quran’s view in regards to prophet’s successorship at the beginning of his book and believes that the Quran has no verse in regards to this matter, however it has many recommendations for looking after the family and relatives of the Prophet. Also he has mentioned the approach of previous prophets in choosing the successor which states that they usually tend to choose one among their relatives as their successor and had this idea that through those verses it could be concluded that the holy Prophet was concerned with the severity of this matter and had liked to choose a person among his family to be his successor, but before he was able to do so, his death arrived suddenly and he was not able to complete his task. In addition he tends to review the verses in which the virtues of Ahlul-Bayt has been mentioned and rejects their implications. This article will try to explain his view in regards to successorship of the Prophet and then it will criticize it through facts and logic.

http://pke.journals.miu.ac.ir/article_1700_fcd8f594a778c0cfffeb16de3b55738f.pdf